College Writing III, English 123

Spring, 1997

Required Text

Literature and Its Writers is the main text for the course; however, students will also be referred to their handbook as needed for help with specific writing problems or questions concerning MLA documentation.

 

Critical Writing After Critical Thinking

English 123 is designed to allow students to put all their analytic reading and writing skills to work on the analysis of imaginative literature. To this end, the class will use the "real questions" technique designed by Dr.Sheila Coghill of Moorhead State University to develop and answer questions about the literature. (See attached). This technique should allow students to focus on aspects of the literature they feel are most important. This will put the responsibility for questioning a work and developing answers to those questions squarely on the students in the class; students shouldn't expect "canned" answers from the instructor. Research into the "real questions" technique has shown that students can and do identify the major issues raised by a work, are more interested in discussing the questions they themselves have generated, and can easily turn questions of interest into thesis statements for essays.

Analytic essays reflecting a student's thinking about a particular work or works will culminate each discussion and will constitute the major portion of the written work in the course. It is expected that the essay will develop a persuasive or informative thesis about the work which is supported by specific reference to the work. A paper which is no more than a retelling of the work (or a summary) will be returned without a grade for reworking.

 

Class Organization

For discussion of individual works, the class will be divided into no more than five work groups. Each group will be assigned one or more works and asked to provide biographical information about the author or authors to the class as a whole as well as presenting their assigned work. Students will be expected to read, discuss and develop "real questions" about all the works in a given assignment; however, a student may choose to write about only one of the works if they so desire.

Students will also be expected to organize the panel presentation of their group. For example, each panel presentation will need a moderator to introduce the group and the work and to keep the panel discussion moving; each member of the group must take a turn acting as moderator.

As a final project, each student will be expected to research, review, and write a movie review, rating the film as "two thumbs up, " or "two thumbs down," or a mixed review. In rating a film like this, you are making a recommendation to the audience about whether or not the movie is worth seeing, Students may choose their own movie, but students may choose to review the same movie and work together on the raw data for the review, but each student must write their own review. The movie review will be presented as a formal oral presentation during the final week of class.

 

Instructor Expectations

 

Proposed Sequence of Readings

Wk I: March 11 and 13 (No class March 13): Theoretical background to literature;

Wk II: March 18, 20:

Wk III: March 25,-27:

Wk IV: April 1,-3:

Wk V: April 8, 10:

Wk VI: April 15,17 Mid-term (Short Story/Poetry)--Thursday, April 17:

Read: Drama Set II

Do: Panel presentations--Drama Set I; Real Questions Technique

Wk VII: April 22, 24:

Reminder: Select your movie for review. See it, think about it, and come to some conclusions about your recommendation.

Wk VIII: April 29, May 1:

Wk IX:May 6, 8:

Wk X: May 13, 15: Oral Presentations of Movie Reviews; written review, Essay VI due Thursday, May 15.

 

A User's Guide to Real Questions

Developed by Dr. Sheila Coghill
Moorhead State University

In order to be a "real" question, the question must:

a) be a question which grows out of your own reading and thinking about the work
b) be a question which cannot be answered "yes" or "no" or is too literal
c) be a question which cannot be answered by a more thorough reading of the text
d) be a question which cannot be answered directly by biographical or historical data
e) be a question to which you would genuinely like an answer because the question interests you

Each student group is to develop questions about the work which meet this criteria. On the way to developing these questions, the group may find itself answering specific questions about the work which may be confusing some group members or may be "yes" or "no" questions. There is nothing wrong with this, but the discussion should not stop there.

The "answers" and questions will be collected at the end of the hour, duplicated and distributed for further discussion.

back to Dr. Milowski's homepage